Patatas enteras s/sal añadida vs Col rizada kale sin sal
Overall, Col rizada kale sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Patatas enteras s/sal añadid... | Col rizada kale sin sal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 25 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Ausencia | Ausencia |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Col rizada kale sin sal has 52% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 52 kcal).
- Col rizada kale sin sal has 41% more fiber (3.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Col rizada kale sin sal has 48% more protein (2.1 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Patatas enteras s/sal añadida
Patata, agua y antioxidante (ácido ascórbico).
Col rizada kale sin sal
Col rizada, agua y antioxidante: ácido ascórbico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Patatas enteras s/sal añadida or Col rizada kale sin sal?
Overall, Col rizada kale sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Col rizada kale sin sal has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Patatas enteras s/sal añadida has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.