Parsons Pickled Mussels 155G vs Mejillón de Chile cocido
Overall, Mejillón de Chile cocido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Parsons Pickled Mussels 155G
Mejillón de Chile cocido
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Parsons Pickled Mussels 155G | Mejillón de Chile cocido |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 97 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 14.4 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Molluscs | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mejillón de Chile cocido has 41% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
- Mejillón de Chile cocido is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Parsons Pickled Mussels 155G lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Parsons Pickled Mussels 155G
Mussels (_Mollusc_), Water, Salt, Acetic acid, Malt vinegar from _barley_ (_gluten_).
Mejillón de Chile cocido
mejillones
FAQ
Which is healthier: Parsons Pickled Mussels 155G or Mejillón de Chile cocido?
Overall, Mejillón de Chile cocido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mejillón de Chile cocido has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 97 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Parsons Pickled Mussels 155G has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.