Comparison
Paranusskerne vs Paranoten
Overall, Paranoten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paranusskerne | Paranoten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 707 kcal | 706 kcal |
| Fat | 68.1 g | 70 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.9 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | — |
| Fiber | 6.4 g | 7.5 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paranoten has 54% less sugar (1.9 g vs 4.1 g).
- Paranoten has 15% more fiber (7.5 g vs 6.4 g).
- Paranusskerne has 18% more protein (17 g vs 14 g).
- Only Paranusskerne lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Paranusskerne
Paranusskerne.
Paranoten
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paranusskerne or Paranoten?
Overall, Paranoten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paranoten has fewer calories: 706 kcal versus 707 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paranoten has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.