Comparison
Paranusskerne vs Paranusskerne
Overall, Paranusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paranusskerne | Paranusskerne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 697 kcal | 707 kcal |
| Fat | 66.5 g | 68.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.3 g | 16.9 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 9.9 g | 6.4 g |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paranusskerne has 39% less sugar (2.5 g vs 4.1 g).
- Paranusskerne has 35% more fiber (9.9 g vs 6.4 g).
- Only Paranusskerne lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Paranusskerne
Not available.
Paranusskerne
Paranusskerne.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paranusskerne or Paranusskerne?
Overall, Paranusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paranusskerne has fewer calories: 697 kcal versus 707 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paranusskerne has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.