Comparison
Paranusskerne - naturbelassen vs Paranusskerne
Overall, Paranusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paranusskerne - naturbelasse... | Paranusskerne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 707 kcal | 707 kcal |
| Fat | 68.1 g | 68.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.9 g | 16.9 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 4.9 g | 6.4 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paranusskerne has 23% more fiber (6.4 g vs 4.9 g).
Ingredients
Paranusskerne - naturbelassen
100% Paranusskerne naturbelassen.
Paranusskerne
Paranusskerne.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paranusskerne - naturbelassen or Paranusskerne?
Overall, Paranusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paranusskerne - naturbelassen has fewer calories: 707 kcal versus 707 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paranusskerne - naturbelassen has less sugar: 4.1 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.