Panna cotta al caramello vs Panna Cota
Overall, Panna cotta al caramello has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna cotta al caramello | Panna Cota |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 175 kcal |
| Fat | 9 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 14.4 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna cotta al caramello has 25% less fat (9 g vs 12 g).
- Panna cotta al caramello has 12% less saturated fat (6 g vs 6.8 g).
- Panna Cota has 17% less sugar (12 g vs 14.4 g).
Ingredients
Panna cotta al caramello
Not available.
Panna Cota
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna cotta al caramello or Panna Cota?
Overall, Panna cotta al caramello has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna cotta al caramello has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna Cota has less sugar: 12 g versus 14.4 g per 100 g.