Comparison

Panna cotta al caramello vs Panna Cota

Overall, Panna cotta al caramello has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPanna cotta al caramelloPanna Cota
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — —
Calories 158 kcal 175 kcal
Fat 9 g 12 g
Saturated fat 6 g 6.8 g
Sugars 14.4 g 12 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Protein 3.5 g 3.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Panna cotta al caramello has 25% less fat (9 g vs 12 g).
  • Panna cotta al caramello has 12% less saturated fat (6 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Panna Cota has 17% less sugar (12 g vs 14.4 g).

Ingredients

Panna cotta al caramello

Not available.

Panna Cota

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Panna cotta al caramello or Panna Cota?

Overall, Panna cotta al caramello has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Panna cotta al caramello has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Panna Cota has less sugar: 12 g versus 14.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons