Panna Cotta vs Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne
Overall, Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna Cotta | Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahn... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 378 kcal | 126 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 6.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 77 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 67% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 378 kcal).
- Panna Cotta has 98% less fat (0.1 g vs 6.1 g).
- Panna Cotta has no saturated fat, while Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 4 g.
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 86% less sugar (11 g vs 77 g).
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 96% more protein (2.7 g vs 0.1 g).
- Only Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Panna Cotta
Sucre roux, amidon de maïs, extrait naturel de vanille de Madagascar, gélifiants : carraghénanes, agar agar.
Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne
Vollmilch, 11 % Sahne, Zucker, modifizierte Stärke, Glukosesirup, Stärke, Verdickungsmittel Carrageen, Aroma, Vanillesamen (extrahiert), Speisesalz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna Cotta or Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne?
Overall, Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has less sugar: 11 g versus 77 g per 100 g.