Panna Cotta vs Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne
Overall, Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Panna Cotta
Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna Cotta | Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahn... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 126 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 6.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.5 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 25% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 169 kcal).
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 49% less fat (6.1 g vs 12 g).
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 53% less saturated fat (4 g vs 8.5 g).
Ingredients
Panna Cotta
crème pasteurisée (44,5%), sucre, protéines de lait, gélifiant (gélatine de boeuf) , arôme naturel de vanille, purée de fruits rouges (83%) (fraise, framboise, groseille, mûre, griotte), sucre.
Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne
Vollmilch, 11 % Sahne, Zucker, modifizierte Stärke, Glukosesirup, Stärke, Verdickungsmittel Carrageen, Aroma, Vanillesamen (extrahiert), Speisesalz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna Cotta or Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne?
Overall, Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna Cotta has less sugar: 11 g versus 11 g per 100 g.