Panna Cotta vs Panna cotta fève tonka caramel
Overall, Panna Cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Panna Cotta
Panna cotta fève tonka caramel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna Cotta | Panna cotta fève tonka caram... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.5 g | 8.1 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 14 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna Cotta has 21% less sugar (11 g vs 14 g).
- Panna Cotta has 20% more protein (3 g vs 2.4 g).
- Panna Cotta has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Panna Cotta
crème pasteurisée (44,5%), sucre, protéines de lait, gélifiant (gélatine de boeuf) , arôme naturel de vanille, purée de fruits rouges (83%) (fraise, framboise, groseille, mûre, griotte), sucre.
Panna cotta fève tonka caramel
_Lait_ entier 48%, _crème_ (_lait_) 26%, préparation aromatisée à base de caramel-beurre salé 20% (sucre, eau, sirop de sucre caramélisé 2,8%, stabilisants : amidon modifié et pectines, _beurre_ salé 0,8% (_beurre_ (_lait_), sel), arôme naturel, fleur de sel de Camargue, jus de citron concentré, conservateur : sorbate de potassium), sucre, amidon de manioc, gélifiant : carraghénanes, infusion de fève tonka en poudre 0,01% (_lait_)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna Cotta or Panna cotta fève tonka caramel?
Overall, Panna Cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna Cotta has fewer calories: 169 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna Cotta has less sugar: 11 g versus 14 g per 100 g.