Panna cotta vs Panna Cotta
Overall, Panna Cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna cotta | Panna Cotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 169 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.5 g | 8.5 g |
| Sugars | 14 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna Cotta has 13% fewer calories (169 kcal vs 194 kcal).
- Panna Cotta has 14% less fat (12 g vs 14 g).
- Panna Cotta has 11% less saturated fat (8.5 g vs 9.5 g).
- Panna Cotta has 21% less sugar (11 g vs 14 g).
- Panna cotta has 12% more protein (3.4 g vs 3 g).
- Panna Cotta has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Panna cotta
Crème entière¹ (46%) (lait), lait écrémé¹, sucre, gélatine, arôme naturel. ¹Lait origine France.
Panna Cotta
crème pasteurisée (44,5%), sucre, protéines de lait, gélifiant (gélatine de boeuf) , arôme naturel de vanille, purée de fruits rouges (83%) (fraise, framboise, groseille, mûre, griotte), sucre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna cotta or Panna Cotta?
Overall, Panna Cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna Cotta has fewer calories: 169 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna Cotta has less sugar: 11 g versus 14 g per 100 g.