Panna cotta vs Panna Cotta
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna cotta | Panna Cotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 378 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 14 g | 77 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna cotta has 49% fewer calories (194 kcal vs 378 kcal).
- Panna Cotta has 99% less fat (0.1 g vs 14 g).
- Panna Cotta has no saturated fat, while Panna cotta has 9.5 g.
- Panna cotta has 82% less sugar (14 g vs 77 g).
- Panna cotta has 97% more protein (3.4 g vs 0.1 g).
- Only Panna cotta lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Panna cotta
Crème entière¹ (46%) (lait), lait écrémé¹, sucre, gélatine, arôme naturel. ¹Lait origine France.
Panna Cotta
Sucre roux, amidon de maïs, extrait naturel de vanille de Madagascar, gélifiants : carraghénanes, agar agar.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna cotta or Panna Cotta?
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna cotta has fewer calories: 194 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna cotta has less sugar: 14 g versus 77 g per 100 g.