Panna Cotta vs Panna Cotta
Overall, Panna Cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna Cotta | Panna Cotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 378 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 77 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna Cotta has 55% fewer calories (169 kcal vs 378 kcal).
- Panna Cotta has 99% less fat (0.1 g vs 12 g).
- Panna Cotta has no saturated fat, while Panna Cotta has 8.5 g.
- Panna Cotta has 86% less sugar (11 g vs 77 g).
- Panna Cotta has 97% more protein (3 g vs 0.1 g).
- Only Panna Cotta lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Panna Cotta
crème pasteurisée (44,5%), sucre, protéines de lait, gélifiant (gélatine de boeuf) , arôme naturel de vanille, purée de fruits rouges (83%) (fraise, framboise, groseille, mûre, griotte), sucre.
Panna Cotta
Sucre roux, amidon de maïs, extrait naturel de vanille de Madagascar, gélifiants : carraghénanes, agar agar.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna Cotta or Panna Cotta?
Overall, Panna Cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna Cotta has fewer calories: 169 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna Cotta has less sugar: 11 g versus 77 g per 100 g.