Comparison

Panna Cota vs Panna cotta

Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Panna Cota

Panna Cota

Dr. Oetker
 Better choice
Panna cotta

Panna cotta

Debic · 10 x 100 ml
NOVA 4

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPanna CotaPanna cotta
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 175 kcal 167 kcal
Fat 12 g 9.2 g
Saturated fat 6.8 g 6.7 g
Sugars 12 g 15 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber — 0.6 g
Protein 3.8 g 4.4 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Panna cotta has 23% less fat (9.2 g vs 12 g).
  • Panna Cota has 20% less sugar (12 g vs 15 g).
  • Panna cotta has 14% more protein (4.4 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Only Panna cotta lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Panna Cota

Not available.

Panna cotta

lait entier,crème 43 %,sucre,gélatine,amidon modifié,émulsifiant,E471,E339,carraghenane,arôme naturel,sans gluten

FAQ

Which is healthier: Panna Cota or Panna cotta?

Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Panna cotta has fewer calories: 167 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Panna Cota has less sugar: 12 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Prepare pour panna cotta vs Panna Cota Prepare pour panna cotta vs Panna cotta Panna Cota vs Preparato per panna cott... Preparato per panna cott... vs Panna cotta Panna Cota vs Crème en poudre Panna Co... Panna cotta vs Crème en poudre Panna Co... Panna Cota vs Preparado per panna Cott... Panna cotta vs Preparado per panna Cott...