Pancetta Copatta vs Gran antipasto italiano
Overall, Gran antipasto italiano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pancetta Copatta | Gran antipasto italiano |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 373 kcal | 299 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 8.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 4.6 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gran antipasto italiano has 20% fewer calories (299 kcal vs 373 kcal).
- Gran antipasto italiano has 36% less fat (21 g vs 33 g).
- Gran antipasto italiano has 33% less saturated fat (8.1 g vs 12 g).
- Pancetta Copatta has 22% less salt (3.6 g vs 4.6 g).
- Gran antipasto italiano has 32% more protein (28 g vs 19 g).
- Only Gran antipasto italiano lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Pork.
Ingredients
Pancetta Copatta
Schweinebauch, Schweinenacken, Salz, Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Gewürze und Kräuter, Konservierungsstoffe: Kaliumnitrat, Natriumnitrit; Aromen
Gran antipasto italiano
jambon cru, coppa, saucisson, Viande de porc, sel, dextrose, épices et plantes aromatiques, antioxydants: ascorbate de sodium; conservateurs: nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium; arômes.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pancetta Copatta or Gran antipasto italiano?
Overall, Gran antipasto italiano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gran antipasto italiano has fewer calories: 299 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pancetta Copatta has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.