Pan Pita Blanco vs Molde Integral Libre de Gluten
Overall, Pan Pita Blanco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pan Pita Blanco | Molde Integral Libre de Glut... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 254 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.6 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 6 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Eggs, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pan Pita Blanco has 58% less fat (1.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Pan Pita Blanco has 77% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pan Pita Blanco has 100% more fiber (2.4 g vs 0 g).
- Pan Pita Blanco has 30% more protein (8.6 g vs 6 g).
- Pan Pita Blanco is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pan Pita Blanco lists: Gluten.
- Only Molde Integral Libre de Gluten lists: Eggs, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Pan Pita Blanco
Harina de trigo, agua, levadura instantánea, sal, azúcar, ácido cítrico, ácido sórbico, propionato de calcio y ácido láctico.
Molde Integral Libre de Gluten
Agua, almidones (maíz, papa, mandioca), aceite vegetal (soya, girasol), harina de arroz, azúcar, linaza, psyllium, fibra de bambú, azúcar, almidón modificado, levadura seca (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), monoestearato de sorbitán, goma xantana, celulosa, hidroxipropilmetilcelulosa, vinagre, sorbato, propionato de calcio.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pan Pita Blanco or Molde Integral Libre de Gluten?
Overall, Pan Pita Blanco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pan Pita Blanco has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 254 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pan Pita Blanco has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2 g per 100 g.