Pan Caiman Tajado vs Pan Pita Blanco
Overall, Pan Pita Blanco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pan Caiman Tajado | Pan Pita Blanco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 264 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 10.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | — |
| Sugars | 5.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 8.6 g |
| Additives | 5 | 4 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pan Pita Blanco has 86% less fat (1.5 g vs 10.9 g).
- Pan Pita Blanco has 66% less sugar (1.9 g vs 5.6 g).
- Pan Caiman Tajado has no salt, while Pan Pita Blanco has 0.4 g.
- Pan Pita Blanco has 100% more fiber (2.4 g vs 0 g).
- Pan Pita Blanco has 73% more protein (8.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Pan Pita Blanco is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pan Caiman Tajado lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Pan Caiman Tajado
Harina de trigo fortificada (hierro, vitamina B1, vitamina B2, niacina, ácido fólico), agua, azúcar, grasa vegetal (aceite de palma y/o palmiste), levadura, sal, mejorador de masa (lecitina de soya, estearoil-2-lactilato de sodio, mono y diglicéridos de ácidos grasos, ácido ascórbico), regulador de pH (ácido láctico), enzimas fúngicas y/o bacterianas.
Pan Pita Blanco
Harina de trigo, agua, levadura instantánea, sal, azúcar, ácido cítrico, ácido sórbico, propionato de calcio y ácido láctico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pan Caiman Tajado or Pan Pita Blanco?
Overall, Pan Pita Blanco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pan Pita Blanco has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pan Pita Blanco has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.