Palitos de pan Frutos secos vs Colines (picos)
Overall, Colines (picos) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Palitos de pan Frutos secos | Colines (picos) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 462 kcal | 396 kcal |
| Fat | 21.9 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 10.2 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colines (picos) has 14% fewer calories (396 kcal vs 462 kcal).
- Colines (picos) has 84% less fat (3.5 g vs 21.9 g).
- Colines (picos) has 77% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 3.1 g).
- Palitos de pan Frutos secos has 18% less sugar (2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Palitos de pan Frutos secos has 22% less salt (2 g vs 2.6 g).
Ingredients
Palitos de pan Frutos secos
Not available.
Colines (picos)
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Palitos de pan Frutos secos or Colines (picos)?
Overall, Colines (picos) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colines (picos) has fewer calories: 396 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Palitos de pan Frutos secos has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.