Palets de légumes vs Butternut Squash Soup
Overall, Palets de légumes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Palets de légumes | Butternut Squash Soup |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 117 kcal | 51 kcal |
| Fat | 6.8 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Butternut Squash Soup has 56% fewer calories (51 kcal vs 117 kcal).
- Butternut Squash Soup has 62% less fat (2.6 g vs 6.8 g).
- Palets de légumes has 24% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.1 g).
- Palets de légumes has 11% less sugar (2.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Palets de légumes has 57% more protein (3 g vs 1.3 g).
- Palets de légumes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Palets de légumes lists: Eggs, Milk.
Ingredients
Palets de légumes
Courge Butternut 45%, panais 29%, huile de tournesol, oignons prefrits (oignons, huile de tournesol), crème fraîche, farine de maïs, blanc d'oeuf en poudre (issu de poules élevées en plein air), ciboulette, sel, paprika,
Butternut Squash Soup
EN ' ORGANIC CREAMY BUTTERNUT SQUASH SOUP WITH SWEET POTATOES. Ingredients. butternut squash puree* 45%, water, sweet potatoes* 13%, coconut cream* (coconut extract, water), corn flour", sea salt, spices*.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Palets de légumes or Butternut Squash Soup?
Overall, Palets de légumes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Butternut Squash Soup has fewer calories: 51 kcal versus 117 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Palets de légumes has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.