Orez Thai Lung vs Orez Natur - brun-integral
Overall, Orez Natur - brun-integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Orez Thai Lung | Orez Natur - brun-integral |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 347 kcal | 349 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Orez Thai Lung has 73% less fat (0.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Orez Thai Lung has 57% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Orez Thai Lung has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Orez Natur - brun-integral has 77% more fiber (4.4 g vs 1 g).
- Orez Natur - brun-integral has 16% more protein (8 g vs 6.7 g).
- Orez Natur - brun-integral has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Orez Thai Lung
Not available.
Orez Natur - brun-integral
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Orez Thai Lung or Orez Natur - brun-integral?
Overall, Orez Natur - brun-integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Orez Thai Lung has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 349 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Orez Thai Lung has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.