Comparison

Orez Thai Lung vs Orez Natur - brun-integral

Overall, Orez Natur - brun-integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOrez Thai LungOrez Natur - brun-integral
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — —
Calories 347 kcal 349 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 2.2 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1 g 4.4 g
Protein 6.7 g 8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Orez Thai Lung has 73% less fat (0.6 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Orez Thai Lung has 57% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Orez Thai Lung has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Orez Natur - brun-integral has 77% more fiber (4.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Orez Natur - brun-integral has 16% more protein (8 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Orez Natur - brun-integral has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Orez Thai Lung

Not available.

Orez Natur - brun-integral

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Orez Thai Lung or Orez Natur - brun-integral?

Overall, Orez Natur - brun-integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Orez Thai Lung has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 349 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Orez Thai Lung has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons