Orez Thai Lung vs Orez
Overall, Orez has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Orez Thai Lung | Orez |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 347 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Orez has 16% more protein (8 g vs 6.7 g).
- Orez has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Orez Thai Lung
Not available.
Orez
orez
FAQ
Which is healthier: Orez Thai Lung or Orez?
Overall, Orez has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Orez has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 347 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Orez has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.