Comparison
Open Nature vs Boneless Ribeye Steak
Overall, Open Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Open Nature | Boneless Ribeye Steak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 188 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 11.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 19.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Open Nature has 16% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 188 kcal).
- Open Nature has 31% less fat (8 g vs 11.6 g).
- Open Nature has 20% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 4.5 g).
Ingredients
Open Nature
Grass Fed Angus Beef
Boneless Ribeye Steak
Grass Fed Beef Ribeye
FAQ
Which is healthier: Open Nature or Boneless Ribeye Steak?
Overall, Open Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Open Nature has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 188 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Open Nature has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.