Comparison
Boneless Ribeye Steak vs Lammsteaks
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boneless Ribeye Steak | Lammsteaks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 188 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 11.6 g | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lammsteaks has 38% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 188 kcal).
- Lammsteaks has 63% less fat (4.3 g vs 11.6 g).
- Lammsteaks has 64% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 4.5 g).
- Boneless Ribeye Steak has no sugar, while Lammsteaks has 0.4 g.
- Boneless Ribeye Steak has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Boneless Ribeye Steak
Grass Fed Beef Ribeye
Lammsteaks
Lammfleisch 99 %, Speisesalz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boneless Ribeye Steak or Lammsteaks?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lammsteaks has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 188 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boneless Ribeye Steak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.