Comparison
Rib eye steak vs Lammsteaks
Overall, Lammsteaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rib eye steak | Lammsteaks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 241 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Beef | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lammsteaks has 52% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 241 kcal).
- Lammsteaks has 77% less fat (4.3 g vs 18.8 g).
- Lammsteaks has 80% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 8 g).
- Rib eye steak has no sugar, while Lammsteaks has 0.4 g.
- Lammsteaks has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rib eye steak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Rib eye steak lists: Beef.
Ingredients
Rib eye steak
BEEF
Lammsteaks
Lammfleisch 99 %, Speisesalz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rib eye steak or Lammsteaks?
Overall, Lammsteaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lammsteaks has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 241 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rib eye steak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.