Quick Steak vs Lammsteaks
Overall, Lammsteaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quick Steak | Lammsteaks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 107 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | — | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 15.2 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Beef | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lammsteaks has 40% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.7 g).
- Quick Steak has no sugar, while Lammsteaks has 0.4 g.
- Quick Steak has no salt, while Lammsteaks has 0.3 g.
- Lammsteaks has 20% more protein (19 g vs 15.2 g).
- Lammsteaks is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Quick Steak lists: Beef.
Ingredients
Quick Steak
BEEF, WATER, DEXTROSE, DEHYDRATED BEEF STOCK, SODIUM PHOSPHATE, CITRUS FIBER, SALT, NATURAL FLAVORS, AUTOLYZED YEAST
Lammsteaks
Lammfleisch 99 %, Speisesalz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quick Steak or Lammsteaks?
Overall, Lammsteaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quick Steak has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quick Steak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.