Comparison
Open Nature vs Quick Steak
Overall, Quick Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Open Nature | Quick Steak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 107 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 15.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Beef |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quick Steak has 32% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 158 kcal).
- Quick Steak has 25% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 3.6 g).
- Open Nature has 29% more protein (21.4 g vs 15.2 g).
- Only Quick Steak lists: Beef.
Ingredients
Open Nature
Grass Fed Angus Beef
Quick Steak
BEEF, WATER, DEXTROSE, DEHYDRATED BEEF STOCK, SODIUM PHOSPHATE, CITRUS FIBER, SALT, NATURAL FLAVORS, AUTOLYZED YEAST
FAQ
Which is healthier: Open Nature or Quick Steak?
Overall, Quick Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quick Steak has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 158 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Open Nature has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.