Comparison
Open Nature vs Lammsteaks
Overall, Open Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Open Nature | Lammsteaks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lammsteaks has 27% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 158 kcal).
- Lammsteaks has 47% less fat (4.3 g vs 8 g).
- Lammsteaks has 55% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 3.6 g).
- Open Nature has no sugar, while Lammsteaks has 0.4 g.
- Open Nature has 11% more protein (21.4 g vs 19 g).
- Open Nature has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Open Nature
Grass Fed Angus Beef
Lammsteaks
Lammfleisch 99 %, Speisesalz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Open Nature or Lammsteaks?
Overall, Open Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lammsteaks has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 158 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Open Nature has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.