Comparison

Olives noires à la grecque vs Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g

Overall, Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOlives noires à la grecqueOlives noires au naturel Kal...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 289 kcal 215 kcal
Fat 28 g 22 g
Saturated fat 3.8 g 2.6 g
Sugars 2.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 5.5 g 3 g
Fiber 8.9 g 4.2 g
Protein 1.7 g 1.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g has 26% fewer calories (215 kcal vs 289 kcal).
  • Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g has 21% less fat (22 g vs 28 g).
  • Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g has 32% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g has 77% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g has 45% less salt (3 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Olives noires à la grecque has 53% more fiber (8.9 g vs 4.2 g).

Ingredients

Olives noires à la grecque

Olive noire, sel, huile d’olive

Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g

Olives noires entières* (origine Grèce), eau, sel, poudre de jus de citron bio* * ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique

FAQ

Which is healthier: Olives noires à la grecque or Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g?

Overall, Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g has fewer calories: 215 kcal versus 289 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Olives noires au naturel Kalamata 200g has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons