Oeufs de saumon vs Kodiak Wildlachs
Overall, Kodiak Wildlachs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oeufs de saumon | Kodiak Wildlachs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 260 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.3 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 31 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kodiak Wildlachs has 57% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 260 kcal).
- Kodiak Wildlachs has 78% less fat (2.8 g vs 13 g).
- Kodiak Wildlachs has 71% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 3.1 g).
- Kodiak Wildlachs has no sugar, while Oeufs de saumon has 1.6 g.
- Kodiak Wildlachs has 18% less salt (2.7 g vs 3.3 g).
- Oeufs de saumon has 29% more protein (31 g vs 22 g).
- Kodiak Wildlachs has the better Nutri-Score.
- Oeufs de saumon is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kodiak Wildlachs lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Oeufs de saumon
Oeufs de saumon sauvage origine Alaska 97%, sel
Kodiak Wildlachs
Rotlachs, Speisesalz, Säureregulator, Natriumlactat, Edelholzrauch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oeufs de saumon or Kodiak Wildlachs?
Overall, Kodiak Wildlachs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kodiak Wildlachs has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kodiak Wildlachs has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.