Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC vs Kodiak Wildlachs
Overall, Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC
Kodiak Wildlachs
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets Saumon rose du Pacifi... | Kodiak Wildlachs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has 29% less fat (2 g vs 2.8 g).
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has 33% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Kodiak Wildlachs has no sugar, while Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has 0.5 g.
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has 93% less salt (0.2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has 76% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC
Filet de Saumon rose du Pacifique
Kodiak Wildlachs
Rotlachs, Speisesalz, Säureregulator, Natriumlactat, Edelholzrauch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC or Kodiak Wildlachs?
Overall, Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kodiak Wildlachs has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.