Oeufs de saumon vs Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC
Overall, Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Oeufs de saumon
Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oeufs de saumon | Filets Saumon rose du Pacifi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 260 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 31 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has 61% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 260 kcal).
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has 85% less fat (2 g vs 13 g).
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has 81% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 3.1 g).
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has 94% less salt (0.2 g vs 3.3 g).
- Oeufs de saumon has 32% more protein (31 g vs 21 g).
- Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Oeufs de saumon
Oeufs de saumon sauvage origine Alaska 97%, sel
Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC
Filet de Saumon rose du Pacifique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oeufs de saumon or Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC?
Overall, Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets Saumon rose du Pacifique MSC has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.