Wild Salmon Steaks vs Kodiak Wildlachs
Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Salmon Steaks | Kodiak Wildlachs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 84 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 24% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 54% less fat (1.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 67% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Kodiak Wildlachs has 18% more protein (22 g vs 18 g).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has the better Nutri-Score.
- Wild Salmon Steaks is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Wild Salmon Steaks
Wild Pink Salmon MSC (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha).
Kodiak Wildlachs
Rotlachs, Speisesalz, Säureregulator, Natriumlactat, Edelholzrauch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Salmon Steaks or Kodiak Wildlachs?
Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wild Salmon Steaks has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Salmon Steaks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.