Comparison

Wild Salmon Steaks vs Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique

Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWild Salmon SteaksFilets de Saumon Rose du Pac...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 84 kcal 174 kcal
Fat 1.3 g 10 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 1.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 18 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wild Salmon Steaks has 52% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 174 kcal).
  • Wild Salmon Steaks has 87% less fat (1.3 g vs 10 g).
  • Wild Salmon Steaks has 81% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Wild Salmon Steaks has no sugar, while Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 0.5 g.
  • Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 14% more protein (21 g vs 18 g).

Ingredients

Wild Salmon Steaks

Wild Pink Salmon MSC (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha).

Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique

saumon

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wild Salmon Steaks or Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique?

Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wild Salmon Steaks has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wild Salmon Steaks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons