Wild Salmon Steaks vs Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique
Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Salmon Steaks | Filets de Saumon Rose du Pac... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 84 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 52% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 174 kcal).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 87% less fat (1.3 g vs 10 g).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 81% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has no sugar, while Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 0.5 g.
- Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 14% more protein (21 g vs 18 g).
Ingredients
Wild Salmon Steaks
Wild Pink Salmon MSC (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha).
Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique
saumon
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Salmon Steaks or Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique?
Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wild Salmon Steaks has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Salmon Steaks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.