Wild Salmon Steaks vs Oeufs de saumon
Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Salmon Steaks | Oeufs de saumon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 84 kcal | 260 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 68% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 260 kcal).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 90% less fat (1.3 g vs 13 g).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 90% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.1 g).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has no sugar, while Oeufs de saumon has 1.6 g.
- Wild Salmon Steaks has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Oeufs de saumon has 42% more protein (31 g vs 18 g).
- Wild Salmon Steaks has the better Nutri-Score.
- Wild Salmon Steaks is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Wild Salmon Steaks lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Wild Salmon Steaks
Wild Pink Salmon MSC (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha).
Oeufs de saumon
Oeufs de saumon sauvage origine Alaska 97%, sel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Salmon Steaks or Oeufs de saumon?
Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wild Salmon Steaks has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Salmon Steaks has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.