Comparison

Wild Salmon Steaks vs Oeufs de saumon

Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWild Salmon SteaksOeufs de saumon
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 84 kcal 260 kcal
Fat 1.3 g 13 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 3.1 g
Sugars 0 g 1.6 g
Salt 0.1 g 3.3 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 18 g 31 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wild Salmon Steaks has 68% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 260 kcal).
  • Wild Salmon Steaks has 90% less fat (1.3 g vs 13 g).
  • Wild Salmon Steaks has 90% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Wild Salmon Steaks has no sugar, while Oeufs de saumon has 1.6 g.
  • Wild Salmon Steaks has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Oeufs de saumon has 42% more protein (31 g vs 18 g).
  • Wild Salmon Steaks has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Wild Salmon Steaks is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Wild Salmon Steaks lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Wild Salmon Steaks

Wild Pink Salmon MSC (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha).

Oeufs de saumon

Oeufs de saumon sauvage origine Alaska 97%, sel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wild Salmon Steaks or Oeufs de saumon?

Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wild Salmon Steaks has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wild Salmon Steaks has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons