Saumon sauvage vs Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique
Overall, Saumon sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saumon sauvage | Filets de Saumon Rose du Pac... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 112 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saumon sauvage has 36% fewer calories (112 kcal vs 174 kcal).
- Saumon sauvage has 70% less fat (3 g vs 10 g).
- Saumon sauvage has no saturated fat, while Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 1.6 g.
- Saumon sauvage has no sugar, while Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 0.5 g.
- Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 84% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
- Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Saumon sauvage
Saumon 95% (Oncorhynchus keta), eau, sel 1,2%, vinaigre.
Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique
saumon
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saumon sauvage or Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique?
Overall, Saumon sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saumon sauvage has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saumon sauvage has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.