Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique vs Kodiak Wildlachs
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de Saumon Rose du Pac... | Kodiak Wildlachs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 174 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kodiak Wildlachs has 36% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 174 kcal).
- Kodiak Wildlachs has 72% less fat (2.8 g vs 10 g).
- Kodiak Wildlachs has 44% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Kodiak Wildlachs has no sugar, while Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 0.5 g.
- Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 93% less salt (0.2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique has the better Nutri-Score.
- Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique
saumon
Kodiak Wildlachs
Rotlachs, Speisesalz, Säureregulator, Natriumlactat, Edelholzrauch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de Saumon Rose du Pacifique or Kodiak Wildlachs?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kodiak Wildlachs has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kodiak Wildlachs has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.