Noodles Asia Style vs Gulaschpfanne
Overall, Noodles Asia Style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Noodles Asia Style | Gulaschpfanne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 122 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | — |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Noodles Asia Style has 16% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 122 kcal).
- Noodles Asia Style has 43% less fat (2.3 g vs 4 g).
- Noodles Asia Style has 32% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Noodles Asia Style has 36% more protein (9.6 g vs 6.1 g).
Ingredients
Noodles Asia Style
Not available.
Gulaschpfanne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Noodles Asia Style or Gulaschpfanne?
Overall, Noodles Asia Style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Noodles Asia Style has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Noodles Asia Style has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.