Nocciolata bianca vs Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta
Overall, Nocciolata bianca has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nocciolata bianca
Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nocciolata bianca | Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 545 kcal | 555 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.6 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 43 g | 48 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 14.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nocciolata bianca has 10% less sugar (43 g vs 48 g).
- Nocciolata bianca has 95% less salt (0.2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Nocciolata bianca has 75% more protein (14.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Only Nocciolata bianca lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Nocciolata bianca
Hazelnootpasta* 30%, ruwe suiker, magere melkpoeder, zonnebloemolie, cacaoboter, emulgator: sojalecithine, vanille-extract.
Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta
Suiker, plantaardige olie (raap, zonnebloem), 13% hazelnoot, 7,5% magerecacaopoeder, maltodextrine, cacaoboter, emulgator (E322), natuurlijk vanillearoma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nocciolata bianca or Ch terra HAZEL NOOT pasta?
Overall, Nocciolata bianca has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nocciolata bianca has fewer calories: 545 kcal versus 555 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nocciolata bianca has less sugar: 43 g versus 48 g per 100 g.