Comparison

Muslo de pato en confit vs Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette

Overall, Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMuslo de pato en confitFilet de Canard Piment d'Esp...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 277 kcal 191 kcal
Fat 20 g 13 g
Saturated fat 6.6 g 4.2 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.7 g
Salt 1.7 g 1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 19 g 17 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette has 31% fewer calories (191 kcal vs 277 kcal).
  • Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette has 35% less fat (13 g vs 20 g).
  • Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette has 36% less saturated fat (4.2 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette has 42% less salt (1 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Muslo de pato en confit has 11% more protein (19 g vs 17 g).
  • Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Muslo de pato en confit

Not available.

Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette

Filet de canard 90%, eau 5.5%, sel, tomate déshydratée, poivrons déshydratés (0.4%), dextrose, épices, plantes aromatiques, semoule de riz, arômes naturels, sucre, piment d'Espelette (0.03%), huile de tournesol, acidifiant : lactate de potassium ou E326 et acétates de sodium ou E262.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Muslo de pato en confit or Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette?

Overall, Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette has fewer calories: 191 kcal versus 277 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de Canard Piment d'Espelette has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons