Muslo de pato en confit vs Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck
Overall, Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Muslo de pato en confit
Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muslo de pato en confit | Gressingham Aromatic Half Cr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 277 kcal | 231 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 9.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.6 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 7.1 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 16.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck has 17% fewer calories (231 kcal vs 277 kcal).
- Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck has 54% less fat (9.3 g vs 20 g).
- Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck has 64% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 6.6 g).
- Muslo de pato en confit has 89% less sugar (0.8 g vs 7.1 g).
- Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck has 53% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- Muslo de pato en confit has 15% more protein (19 g vs 16.2 g).
- Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Muslo de pato en confit
Not available.
Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck
Aromatic Duck (61%) (Duck, Water, Salt, Rice Wine (Water, Alcohol, Glutinous Rice, Koji), Sugar, Ground Seasoning (Fennel, Star Anise, Pepper, Galangal, Cardamom, Liquorice, Clove, Bay, Cinnamon, Orange Peel, Ginger), Pancakes (21%) (Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Nicotinamide, Thiamine Hydrochloride), Water, Rapeseed Oil, Potato Starch, Salt, Hoisin Sauce (17%) (Water, Sugar, Yellow Bean Sauce (Soya Bean, Water, Salt, Wheat Flour, Sugar, Salt), Rice Wine Vinegar, Cornflour, Mirin (Glutinous Rice, Water, Glucose Syrup, Alcohol, Rice), Garlic Puree, Spices (Fennel, Cinnamon, Star Anise, Black Pepper, Clove), Barley Malt Extract, Cayenne).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muslo de pato en confit or Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck?
Overall, Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gressingham Aromatic Half Crispy Duck has fewer calories: 231 kcal versus 277 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muslo de pato en confit has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.