Comparison

Muslo de pato en confit vs Filet de canard

Overall, Filet de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Muslo de pato en confit	Filet de canard
Nutri-Score	d	a
NOVA group	—	1
Calories	277 kcal	190 kcal
Fat	20 g	13 g
Saturated fat	6.6 g	4.3 g
Sugars	0.8 g	0.5 g
Salt	1.7 g	0.2 g
Fiber	—	0 g
Protein	19 g	18 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Filet de canard has 31% fewer calories (190 kcal vs 277 kcal).
Filet de canard has 35% less fat (13 g vs 20 g).
Filet de canard has 35% less saturated fat (4.3 g vs 6.6 g).
Filet de canard has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
Filet de canard has 90% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.7 g).
Filet de canard has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Muslo de pato en confit

Not available.

Filet de canard

FAQ

Which is healthier: Muslo de pato en confit or Filet de canard?

Overall, Filet de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de canard has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 277 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de canard has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Foie gras de canard enti... vs Filet de canard Muslo de pato en confit vs Gressingham Aromatic Hal... Filet de canard vs Gressingham Aromatic Hal... Muslo de pato en confit vs Gésiers de Canard Confit de gésiers de can... vs Muslo de pato en confit Confit de gésiers de can... vs Filet de canard Gésiers de Canard vs Filet de canard GESIERS DE CANARD CUITS... vs Filet de canard