Confit de gésiers de canard entiers vs Filet de canard
Overall, Confit de gésiers de canard entiers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Confit de gésiers de canard entiers
Filet de canard
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Confit de gésiers de canard... | Filet de canard |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 152 kcal | 190 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 4.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 32 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Confit de gésiers de canard entiers has 20% fewer calories (152 kcal vs 190 kcal).
- Confit de gésiers de canard entiers has 81% less fat (2.5 g vs 13 g).
- Confit de gésiers de canard entiers has 79% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 4.3 g).
- Confit de gésiers de canard entiers has no sugar, while Filet de canard has 0.5 g.
- Filet de canard has 91% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Confit de gésiers de canard entiers has 44% more protein (32 g vs 18 g).
- Filet de canard has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Confit de gésiers de canard entiers
Gésiers de canard gras (Origine : Bulgarie), graisse de canard, sel. Pipote de rață îngrășată (origine Bulgaria), grăsime de rață, sare.
Filet de canard
Filet de canard
FAQ
Which is healthier: Confit de gésiers de canard entiers or Filet de canard?
Overall, Confit de gésiers de canard entiers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Confit de gésiers de canard entiers has fewer calories: 152 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Confit de gésiers de canard entiers has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.