Comparison

Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 vs Muscat de Provence

Overall, Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMuscat de Rivesaltes 2009Muscat de Provence
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 0 kcal 90 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat — 0 g
Sugars 0 g 19.6 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 2.7 g
Protein 0 g 0.7 g
Additives00
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no calories, while Muscat de Provence has 90 kcal.
  • Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no fat, while Muscat de Provence has 0.5 g.
  • Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no sugar, while Muscat de Provence has 19.6 g.
  • Muscat de Provence has 100% more fiber (2.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Muscat de Provence has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009

Vin doux naturel (_sulfites_).

Muscat de Provence

Raisin Muscat de Hambourg

FAQ

Which is healthier: Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 or Muscat de Provence?

Overall, Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 90 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has less sugar: 0 g versus 19.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons