Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 vs Muscat de Provence
Overall, Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 | Muscat de Provence |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 90 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 19.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no calories, while Muscat de Provence has 90 kcal.
- Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no fat, while Muscat de Provence has 0.5 g.
- Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no sugar, while Muscat de Provence has 19.6 g.
- Muscat de Provence has 100% more fiber (2.7 g vs 0 g).
- Muscat de Provence has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Only Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009
Vin doux naturel (_sulfites_).
Muscat de Provence
Raisin Muscat de Hambourg
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 or Muscat de Provence?
Overall, Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 90 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has less sugar: 0 g versus 19.6 g per 100 g.