Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 vs Muscat de Lunel
Overall, Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 | Muscat de Lunel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 55 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no calories, while Muscat de Lunel has 55 kcal.
- Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no fat, while Muscat de Lunel has 0.5 g.
- Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no sugar, while Muscat de Lunel has 10 g.
- Muscat de Lunel has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Muscat de Lunel has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009
Vin doux naturel (_sulfites_).
Muscat de Lunel
Raisins (SULFITES), alcool, acide citrique, acide métatartrique, conservateur: dioxyde de souffre (SULFITES)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 or Muscat de Lunel?
Overall, Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 55 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has less sugar: 0 g versus 10 g per 100 g.