Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 vs Vurgin muscat
Overall, Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 | Vurgin muscat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 9.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no calories, while Vurgin muscat has 50 kcal.
- Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no sugar, while Vurgin muscat has 9.3 g.
- Only Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009
Vin doux naturel (_sulfites_).
Vurgin muscat
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 or Vurgin muscat?
Overall, Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has less sugar: 0 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.