Muscat de Provence vs Vurgin muscat
Overall, Vurgin muscat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muscat de Provence | Vurgin muscat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 90 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 19.6 g | 9.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | — |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vurgin muscat has 45% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 90 kcal).
- Vurgin muscat has no fat, while Muscat de Provence has 0.5 g.
- Vurgin muscat has 53% less sugar (9.3 g vs 19.6 g).
- Muscat de Provence has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Muscat de Provence
Raisin Muscat de Hambourg
Vurgin muscat
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muscat de Provence or Vurgin muscat?
Overall, Vurgin muscat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vurgin muscat has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 90 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vurgin muscat has less sugar: 9.3 g versus 19.6 g per 100 g.