Comparison

Muscat de Provence vs Natureo Muscat

Overall, Natureo Muscat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMuscat de ProvenceNatureo Muscat
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — 3
Calories 90 kcal 19 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g —
Sugars 19.6 g 3.8 g
Salt 0 g —
Fiber 2.7 g —
Protein 0.7 g 0 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedSulphur dioxide and sulphites, Schwefeldioxid

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Natureo Muscat has 79% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 90 kcal).
  • Natureo Muscat has no fat, while Muscat de Provence has 0.5 g.
  • Natureo Muscat has 81% less sugar (3.8 g vs 19.6 g).
  • Muscat de Provence has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Natureo Muscat lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Schwefeldioxid.

Ingredients

Muscat de Provence

Raisin Muscat de Hambourg

Natureo Muscat

alkoholfreier Wein, E242, Schwefeldioxid

FAQ

Which is healthier: Muscat de Provence or Natureo Muscat?

Overall, Natureo Muscat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Natureo Muscat has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 90 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Natureo Muscat has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 19.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons