Muscat de Lunel vs Muscat de Provence
Overall, Muscat de Lunel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muscat de Lunel | Muscat de Provence |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 55 kcal | 90 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10 g | 19.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muscat de Lunel has 39% fewer calories (55 kcal vs 90 kcal).
- Muscat de Lunel has 49% less sugar (10 g vs 19.6 g).
- Muscat de Provence has 81% more fiber (2.7 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Muscat de Lunel lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Muscat de Lunel
Raisins (SULFITES), alcool, acide citrique, acide métatartrique, conservateur: dioxyde de souffre (SULFITES)
Muscat de Provence
Raisin Muscat de Hambourg
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muscat de Lunel or Muscat de Provence?
Overall, Muscat de Lunel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muscat de Lunel has fewer calories: 55 kcal versus 90 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muscat de Lunel has less sugar: 10 g versus 19.6 g per 100 g.