Comparison

Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 vs Natureo Muscat

Overall, Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMuscat de Rivesaltes 2009Natureo Muscat
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 0 kcal 19 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 3.8 g
Salt 0 g —
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives02
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesSulphur dioxide and sulphites, Schwefeldioxid

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no calories, while Natureo Muscat has 19 kcal.
  • Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has no sugar, while Natureo Muscat has 3.8 g.
  • Only Natureo Muscat lists: Schwefeldioxid.

Ingredients

Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009

Vin doux naturel (_sulfites_).

Natureo Muscat

alkoholfreier Wein, E242, Schwefeldioxid

FAQ

Which is healthier: Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 or Natureo Muscat?

Overall, Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Muscat de Rivesaltes 2009 has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons