Muesli 6 frutas vs Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch
Overall, Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muesli 6 frutas | Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 444 kcal | 370 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 24 g | 9.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 6.2 g | 9.5 g |
| Protein | 7.6 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Nuts, Avena | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 17% fewer calories (370 kcal vs 444 kcal).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 90% less fat (1.8 g vs 17 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 90% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 4.8 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 61% less sugar (9.3 g vs 24 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 35% more fiber (9.5 g vs 6.2 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 31% more protein (11 g vs 7.6 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has the better Nutri-Score.
- Muesli 6 frutas is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Muesli 6 frutas lists: Nuts, Avena.
Ingredients
Muesli 6 frutas
Copos de avena" integrales 28,3%, azúcar de caña", arroz integral 10,6%, uvas pasas" 10,1% (uvas", aceite de girasol"), aceite de girasol" (semillas de girasol", antioxidante: extracto de romero*), harina de trigo 4,4%, coco rallado 4,4%, copos de trigo" integrales 4,4%, copos de cebada" integrales 4,4%, chips de plátano* 4,1% (plátano* 2,4%, aceite de coco", azúcar de caña", miel"), higos" 2,5% (higos" harina de arroz"), almendras" enteras 2%, avellanas* picadas tostadas 2%
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch
Wholewheat Flour, Sugar, Malted Barley Extract, Partially Inverted Sugar Syrup, Salt, Niacin, Iron, Pantothenic Acid, Thiamin, Riboflavin, Vitamin B6, Folic Acid, Vitamin B12.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muesli 6 frutas or Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch?
Overall, Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has fewer calories: 370 kcal versus 444 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has less sugar: 9.3 g versus 24 g per 100 g.