Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch vs Weetabix
Overall, Weetabix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch | Weetabix |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 370 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 9.3 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 9.5 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Weetabix has 55% less sugar (4.2 g vs 9.3 g).
- Weetabix is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch
Wholewheat Flour, Sugar, Malted Barley Extract, Partially Inverted Sugar Syrup, Salt, Niacin, Iron, Pantothenic Acid, Thiamin, Riboflavin, Vitamin B6, Folic Acid, Vitamin B12.
Weetabix
Wholegrain _Wheat_ (95%), Malted _Barley_ Extract, Sugar, Salt, Niacin, Iron, Riboflavin (B2), Thiamin (B1), Folic Acid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch or Weetabix?
Overall, Weetabix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Weetabix has fewer calories: 355 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Weetabix has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.